Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
2faa8feedc revert: remove concurrency from gha
All checks were successful
CI TEST3 / unit-test (pull_request) Successful in 37s
CI TEST3 / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
CI TEST3 / mutation-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI TEST3 / fuzz-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
The `cancel-in-progress` option for concurrency is not really supported by Gitea, so the whole point of the block no longer makes any sense.
2026-03-17 20:09:53 -04:00
7148704dd3 test: will this cancel?
Some checks failed
CI TEST3 / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI TEST3 / unit-test (pull_request) Successful in 36s
CI TEST3 / mutation-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI TEST3 / fuzz-test (pull_request) Failing after 55s
2026-03-17 20:04:05 -04:00
f31100b23a test: try again, doubled the job capacity
All checks were successful
CI TEST2 / unit-test (pull_request) Successful in 55s
CI TEST2 / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m43s
CI TEST2 / fuzz-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI TEST2 / mutation-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
2026-03-17 20:03:23 -04:00
a9b157d4b2 test: does the previous CI check get canceled?
All checks were successful
CI TEST / lint (pull_request) Successful in 51s
CI TEST / unit-test (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI TEST / fuzz-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI TEST / mutation-test (pull_request) Successful in 2m37s
2026-03-17 19:54:02 -04:00
9726670dea feat: only one CI job at a time per PR
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / unit-test (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / fuzz-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / mutation-test (pull_request) Successful in 43s
This prevents the Gitea runner from getting clogged up with stale CI checks.
2026-03-17 19:51:19 -04:00
62bc15a979 refactor: rename lint.yml to ci.yml
The `lint.yml` workflow contains more than just linting jobs. Renaming it to `ci.yml`, which is more general, and common practice.
2026-03-17 19:49:21 -04:00
ea805b28e4 fix: EqualFunc not deterministic (#2)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 51s
CI / unit-test (push) Successful in 25s
CI / fuzz-test (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI / mutation-test (push) Successful in 41s
The `ExampleEqualFunc_badEqualFunc` was non-deterministic, because the hashes used in the `CustomTable` could (by chance) map "Rob" and "Robert" to the same slot.

- Updated the test to use a deterministic hash.

Reviewed-on: #2
Co-authored-by: M.V. Hutz <git@maximhutz.me>
Co-committed-by: M.V. Hutz <git@maximhutz.me>
2026-03-17 01:54:24 +00:00
717408239b chore: move from tools/dsa (#1)
Some checks failed
CI / lint (push) Successful in 51s
CI / unit-test (push) Failing after 25s
CI / fuzz-test (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI / mutation-test (push) Successful in 42s
Moved the implementation of this hash table from `tools/dsa` #1.

Reviewed-on: #1
Co-authored-by: M.V. Hutz <git@maximhutz.me>
Co-committed-by: M.V. Hutz <git@maximhutz.me>
2026-03-17 01:22:42 +00:00
553117cb30 Initial commit 2026-03-17 00:59:15 +00:00